Skip to content

@osd/pm — The OpenSearch Dashboards project management tool

@osd/pm is a project management tool inspired by Lerna, which enables sharing code between OpenSearch Dashboards and OpenSearch Dashboards plugins.

To run @osd/pm, go to OpenSearch Dashboards root and run yarn osd.

Why @osd/pm?

Long-term we want to get rid of Webpack from production (basically, it's causing a lot of problems, using a lot of memory and adding a lot of complexity). Ideally we want each plugin to build its own separate production bundles for both server and UI. To get there all OpenSearch Dashboards plugins need to be able to build their production bundles separately from OpenSearch Dashboards , which means they need to be able to depend on code from OpenSearch Dashboards without import-ing random files directly from the OpenSearch Dashboards source code.

From a plugin perspective there are two different types of OpenSearch Dashboards dependencies: runtime and static dependencies. Runtime dependencies are things that are instantiated at runtime and that are injected into the plugin, for example config and opensearch clients. Static dependencies are those dependencies that we want to import. opensearch-eslint-config-opensearch-dashboards is one example of this, and it's actually needed because eslint requires it to be a separate package. But we also have dependencies like datemath, flot, eui and others that we control, but where we want to import them in plugins instead of injecting them (because injecting them would be painful to work with). (Btw, these examples aren't necessarily a part of the OpenSearch Dashboards repo today, they are just meant as examples of code that we might at some point want to include in the repo while having them be importable in OpenSearch Dashboards plugins like any other npm package)

Another reason we need static dependencies is that we're starting to introduce TypeScript into OpenSearch Dashboards , and to work nicely with TypeScript across plugins we need to be able to statically import dependencies. We have for example built an observable library for OpenSearch Dashboards in TypeScript and we need to expose both the functionality and the TypeScript types to plugins (so other plugins built with TypeScript can depend on the types for the lib).

However, even though we have multiple packages we don't necessarily want to npm publish them. The ideal solution for us is being able to work on code locally in the OpenSearch Dashboards repo and have a nice workflow that doesn't require publishing, but where we still get the value of having "packages" that are available to plugins, without these plugins having to import files directly from the OpenSearch Dashboards folder.

Basically, we just want to be able to share "static code" (aka being able to import) between OpenSearch Dashboards and OpenSearch Dashboards plugins. To get there we need tooling.

@osd/pm is a tool that helps us manage these static dependencies, and it enables us to share these packages between OpenSearch Dashboards and OpenSearch Dashboards plugins. It also enables these packages to have their own dependencies and their own build scripts, while still having a nice developer experience.

How it works

Internal usage

For packages that are referenced within the OpenSearch Dashboards repo itself, we are leveraging Yarn's workspaces feature. This allows yarn to optimize node_modules within the entire repo to avoid duplicate modules by hoisting common packages as high in the dependency tree as possible.

To reference a package from within the OpenSearch Dashboards repo, simply use the current version number from that package's package.json file. Then, running yarn osd bootstrap will symlink that package into your dependency tree. That means you can make changes to @osd/i18n and immediately have them available in OpenSearch Dashboards itself. No npm publish needed anymore — OpenSearch Dashboards will always rely directly on the code that's in the local packages.

External Plugins

For external plugins, referencing packages in OpenSearch Dashboards relies on link: style dependencies in Yarn. With link: dependencies you specify the relative location to a package instead of a version when adding it to package.json. For example:

"@osd/i18n": "link:packages/osd-i18n"

Now when you run yarn it will set up a symlink to this folder instead of downloading code from the npm registry. This allows external plugins to always use the versions of the package that is bundled with the OpenSearch Dashboards version they are running inside of.

"@osd/i18n": "link:../../opensearch-dashboards/packages/osd-date-math"

This works because we moved to a strict location of OpenSearch Dashboards plugins, ./plugins/{pluginName} inside of OpenSearch Dashboards , or ../opensearch-dashboards-extra/{pluginName} relative to OpenSearch Dashboards . This is one of the reasons we wanted to move towards a setup that looks like this:

opensearch
└── opensearch-dashboards
    └── plugins
        ├── opensearch-dashboards-example

Relying on link: style dependencies means we no longer need to npm publish our OpenSearch Dashboards specific packages. It also means that plugin authors no longer need to worry about the versions of the OpenSearch Dashboards packages, as they will always use the packages from their local OpenSearch Dashboards .

The osd use-cases

Bootstrapping

Now, instead of installing all the dependencies with just running yarn you use the @osd/pm tool, which can install dependencies (and set up symlinks) in all the packages using one command (aka "bootstrap" the setup).

To bootstrap OpenSearch Dashboards :

yarn osd bootstrap

By default, @osd/pm will bootstrap all packages within OpenSearch Dashboards , plus all OpenSearch Dashboards plugins located in ./plugins or ../opensearch-dashboards-extra. There are several options for skipping parts of this, e.g. to skip bootstrapping of OpenSearch Dashboards plugins:

yarn osd bootstrap --skip-opensearch-dashboards-plugins

Or just skip few selected packages:

yarn osd bootstrap --exclude @osd/pm --exclude @osd/i18n

For more details, run:

yarn osd

Bootstrapping also calls the osd:bootstrap script for every included project. This is intended for packages that need to be built/transpiled to be usable.

Running scripts

Some times you want to run the same script across multiple packages and plugins, e.g. build or test. Instead of jumping into each package and running yarn build you can run:

yarn osd run build

And if needed, you can skip packages in the same way as for bootstrapping, e.g. with --exclude and --skip-opensearch-dashboards-plugins:

yarn osd run build --exclude opensearch-dashboards

Watching

During development you can also use osd to watch for changes. For this to work package should define osd:watch script in the package.json:

yarn osd watch

By default osd watch will sort all packages within OpenSearch Dashboards into batches based on their mutual dependencies and run watch script for all packages in the correct order.

As with any other osd command, you can use --include and --exclude filters to watch only for a selected packages:

yarn osd watch --include @osd/pm --include opensearch-dashboards

Building packages for production

The production build process relies on both the Grunt setup at the root of the OpenSearch Dashboards project and code in @osd/pm. The full process is described in tasks/build/packages.js.

Development

This package is run from OpenSearch Dashboards root, using yarn osd. This will run the "pre-built" (aka built and committed to git) version of this tool, which is located in the dist/ folder. This will also use the included version of Yarn instead of using your local install of Yarn.

If you need to build a new version of this package, run yarn build in this folder.

Even though this file is generated we commit it to OpenSearch Dashboards , because it's used before dependencies are fetched (as this is the tool actually responsible for fetching dependencies).

Technical decisions

Why our own tool?

While exploring the approach to static dependencies we built PoCs using npm 5 (which symlinks packages using file: dependencies), Yarn workspaces, Yarn (using link: dependencies), and Lerna.

In the end we decided to build our own tool, based on Yarn, and link: dependencies, and workspaces. This gave us the control we wanted, and it fits nicely into our context (e.g. where publishing to npm isn't necessarily something we want to do).

Some notes from this exploration

file: dependencies in npm<5 and in yarn

When you add a dependency like "foo": "file:../../opensearch-dashboards/packages/foo", both npm<5 and yarn copies the files into the node_modules folder. This means you can't easily make changes to the plugin while developing. Therefore this is a no-go.

file: dependencies in npm5

In npm5 file: dependencies changed to symlink instead of copy the files. This means you can have a nicer workflow while developing packages locally. However, we hit several bugs when using this feature, and we often had to re-run npm install in packages. This is likely because we used an early version of the new file: dependencies in npm5.

This is the same feature as file: dependencies in npm5. However, we did not hit any problems with them during our exploration.

Yarn workspaces

Enables specifying multiple "workspaces" (aka packages/projects) in package.json. When running yarn from the root, Yarn will install all the dependencies for these workspaces and hoist the dependencies to the root (to "deduplicate" packages). However:

Workspaces must be children of the workspace root in term of folder hierarchy. You cannot and must not reference a workspace that is located outside of this filesystem hierarchy.

So Yarn workspaces requires a shared root, which (at least currently) doesn't fit OpenSearch Dashboards , and it's therefore a no-go for now.

Lerna

Lerna is based on symlinking packages (similarly to the link feature which exists in both npm and Yarn, but it's not directly using that feature). It's a tool built specifically for managing JavaScript projects with multiple packages. However, it's primarily built (i.e. optimized) for monorepo libraries, so it's focused on publishing packages and other use-cases that are not necessarily optimized for our use-cases. It's also not ideal for the setup we currently have, with one app that "owns everything" and the rest being packages for that app.

Why a local version of Yarn?

See the vendor readme.